So I must admit I'm curious why people so obviously familiar with and supportive of Dylan would develop a new langauge very much like Dylan but revert to S-Expr syntax. Anyone care to comment? I'm aware of the main advantages of S-Expr syntax, but I thought that the argument for Dylan was that its macro system allowed the most common and useful applications of Lisp macros without requiring such a controversial syntax. How do you see Goo vis-a-vis Dylan? Do you see it as a competitor to Dylan or more of a complement? -- Miles Egan <miles@caddr.com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part